Milagro Gramz says the $75,000 judgment in Megan Thee Stallion’s defamation case is money she does not have sitting around.
After a federal court reinstated the award in Megan’s favor and entered final judgment, Milagro filed a new motion asking the judge to pause collection while she appeals. Milagro, who is representing herself, told the court that immediate enforcement could damage her ability to keep fighting the case before the Eleventh Circuit.
Megan was awarded $75,000 after the court reinstated the defamation verdict.
Milagro Gramz hears about the reversal live and responds stating Megan Thee Stallion didn't follow proper protocol,.the judge already made a decision so it's just a couple more thousand, essentially who cares, as she drops virtual bombs, seemingly still bragging about a win. pic.twitter.com/IIbGnFCZpw
— Weirdlagro (@weirdlagro) May 30, 2026
“Enforcement during the pendency of the appeal may create significant hardship and impair [my] ability to effectively pursue appellate relief,” Milagro wrote.
In the filing, Milagro described herself as “an individual and self-employed media commentator, researcher, and content creator.” She said her income comes from “operating multiple online media platforms,” where she gathers information, conducts research, comments, and shares it with the public.
Milagro said her revenue is inconsistent and depends on online support, subscriptions, platform monetization, and other revenue streams, which vary month to month. She also told the court that she supports her household and two minor children.
Milagro Mookie Gramz says what Megan Thee Stallion should be doing in regards to the case she won. pic.twitter.com/0EJn66GziX
— Weirdlagro (@weirdlagro) June 4, 2026
“I do not possess substantial liquid assets and do not have the financial resources necessary to immediately satisfy the judgment or post a full supersedeas bond,” she wrote.
Milagro also said she does not own major assets she could quickly sell to pay the judgment.
“Immediate collection efforts would create a substantial hardship and could significantly impair my ability to pursue my appeal,” she wrote, listing potential expenses including filing fees, transcripts, record preparation, and legal research.
Milagro said her appeal was filed “in good faith” and asked the judge to “waive, reduce, or otherwise modify any supersedeas bond requirement.”