Comments

Invado Verus Custos

Sadly, Obama is an abolsute failure as president! He has accomplished no legislative victories and is devoid of any ideas on fiscal strategy. Maybe most important, he's an utter incompetent failure in character assesment. His ability to nominate and appoint the right person is abominable. Eric Holder, being the attorney general is a joke. Of course the justice department will not prosecute Goldman Sachs, their boss is just as inept as the "MULATTO" who appointed him. Thank you for spenting millions on a waste of time investigation. When a man hangs out with Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and Reverend Jeremiah Wright before he takes elected office. What led us to believe he was capable of putting the right person in the right postion after taking office?

The Democrats code of conduct is the same has the Republicans. Dems, have just fool their lemmings into believing otherwise. Both political parties bow down to our banks. The five biggest banks are responsible for 56% of our Gross National Product(GNP). Goldman Sachs, being one of the five, have their claws too entrenched in both parties to be brought to justice.

The harbinger of hope and change is just another clueless democrat who only knows how to raise taxes. At least his Republican challenger has a history of turning around business for profit and growth. That's is the diference between the two. Mitt Romney, is a turn around guy. Turning around corporations is what the future president elect does best.

The United States of America, Inc., needs a turn around.

Romney 2012, bYe!


sanityplease

Invado Verus Custos, It's true that both parties have been corrupted by the banks, but the only congress people who even made an attempt at reigning them in after the financial collapse have been democrats. Also, a big part of Romney's success at Bain involved saddling companies with debt and then laying off workers and pocketing profits once they failed. If you vote for that man and his many off-shore accounts and dancing horse (for which he claimed a tax deduction), you are a fool. I'm sure the same misguided thinking led you to vote for Bush II, our last businessman-president. Question for you and all Republican lemmings: Who was the last 'successful' business man to run this country successfully?


Invado Verus Custos

Oh my, only two upright walkers commented on this thread so far...

@sanityplease............some sanity...please!

How do you reign someone in while taking their money? Btw, the biggest taker is our 44th president. You know this right? Barack "HUSSEIN" Obama, has taken more Wall Street donations than ANY politician...ANY! I"m not even mad at him--though he's a hypocritic.

For the record, Mitt Romney WASN'T A POLITICIAN while heading Bain Capital. He was a corporation CEO with investors to please. Real world stuff my friend. Only in fairy land does everyone keep their jobs no matter how well the company is doing. The biggest burden on business is labor cost. Layoffs happen, unfortunely "small fries" get eight- six first.

If you were worth 250 million, you would have off shore accounts yourself. It's LEGAL to invest in foreign banks--ask Nancy Pelosi.

George Bush "W", wasn't a business man. Two oil companies his father gave him went under. George Jr., nor Barack Obama(community organizer), can even come close to matching Mitt Romney. He is one of thee most accomplished candidates EVER!

Bush, wasn't a business man, he was given toys to prove himself to daddy.

So you can't be a successful business man and run our country successfully? Then what's Obama's excuse?