Like a tax *** is wrong...it's the law you idiots. The people who own Obama and Romney wrote the laws that way so they can be exempt offshore and the rest of us become debt slaves and pay taxes. Wake up people...you don't have a real political choice, Obama = Romney...they're both owned by the same special interest groups. Have a bearable apocalypse....nothing will change (but you can keep "hoping" like Obama wants you to).
Romney has cash stashed all over the world. He's an out-of-touch multimillionaire who said just the other day that people should only get the education they can "afford." What kind of mentality is that at a time when people DESPERATELY need an education to get ahead? He's a rich monster!
Go with the bruthaman with the winning plan! OBAMA 2012[SPAM]!!!!!!!!
Zoup, I hate to break this to you...but somebody has to do it because it's about four years old. But Obama extended the Bush tax cuts (idiot). And I know that you're way out of your league and couldn't possibly answer this question, but can you articulate with precision how Obama is for the middle class? Now, don't pass off no dumb azz campaign slogans or talking points you heard on TV.....lol....see if you can actually say something other than RA-RA bullsh*t.
LMAO....Zoup, granted...based on your completely unintelligent posts, no one addresses you because it's clear you don't have the fire power to engage in intelligent debate. You're rather a cheerleader who regurgitates liberal talking points to the detriment of your own self. I say detriment because clearly you're a follower and nothing more. At least Loser1stillhere can articulate his obsession with Obama and the Democrats. You can't even do that cheerleader....
Cosign @ barn...
This is the "feel good" section for idiots who pluck the low hanging fruit claiming that they know something. We got a fool up here in Zoup claiming Obama is for the middle class when the middle class is going to have to cough up 8% of their annual income for insurance, while companies like Walmart won't have to pay insurance still.
Romney doesn't have to bed for money since the corporations are propping him up. The closer it gets to election time and they see he has no chance of winning, his money will dry up.
Obama might not be doing all of the right things, but between him and Romney, there isn't much of a choice. I choose to vote and this will be a vote for the person who closely represents the things I believe in, and that's not Romney.
I saw an interesting study lately that showed when "Left-leaning" politicians are in office, the gap between the rich and the poor are the widest.
@ Loser1stillhere, Obama isn't anything to be proud of...he ain't no descendent of slaves, he ain't been what I've been through....this n*gga was raised by the CIA and lived in Indonesia and Hawaii. He look like me, but he ain't like me....nor any of us for that matter. This dude was a card carrying member of the communist party and got his whole ideology from alleged Grandfather Frank Marshall Davis. All Obama is doing is duping simple minded n*ggaz who just prefer to have someone in the Oval Office look like them despite stabbing them in the back.
Who wants to take the honor of listing all of the *** backhanded, backstabbing things that Obama has done? Don't forget to list the National Defense Resources Prepardness Executive Order that allows the Executive Branch to take over the entire country, or the NDAA which eliminates due process, or the RENEWAL of the Patriot Act (of which Obama campaigned he would not renew), or all the egregious wars, the Predator Drone attacks which to date has more than trippled what Bush did in 2 terms, and so on, and so on. Obama is a traitor...
-- Former Obama supporter
I agree Greg in regards to making corporate welfare an issue. However, giving the government more money doesn't make sense. But let's attack the root cause of that...which is bigger government. We don't need it and all it leads to is dictatorship (of which is quite clear that we're on the way towards...especially with the help of Obama) and a bankrupt populace. Taxes don't spurn an economy...capital does. But I'm a root cause type of guy...we wouldn't have so many taxes if a) We didn't have a debt based monetary system and b) didn't have such big government. So the Left Right solutions don't work....we need to start with ending the Fed.
@ Zoup...oh yeah that's right, you're the smart dumb n*gga from last week....completely forgot. Thanks for reminding me....sissy boy. Love the empty headed cheerleading....you really do have a lot to say. Lol... When you graduate from talking points and spoon fed ideology, and can actually formulate a constructive opinion, holla at me. May I suggest some reading materials for you to step your game up? I know you're a victim of the dumbing down of this country, but on the real though....trying to help you not be a smart dumb azz.
@GreenDozen
I don't think Left or Right solutions work. Both are too rigid in their beliefs. If they could meet somewhere in the middle I think that would be ideal, but I don't see it happening. I think tax reform is a big issue. Companies can't have mailboxes and operations located in other countries to get out of paying taxes and not hire Americans, but get the credit of not having to pay tariffs on those products. This is my problem with both parties.
Barn
Where I'm going with it is that nobody has to be poor in this country. There's too much money and wealth. You don't have to redistribute wealth if you fixed the laws that create the wealth divide. Most people don't want to be billionaires, nor do they want to be millionaires, they just want a fair chance to live their life. What's been happening in this country is not fair to the poor, nor is it fair to the middle class. People like to say that the rich pay the majority of taxes, if that's the case then why is the middle class shrinking, and the wealthy are getting wealthier?
This is no surprise; Mitt has funding ***, I'm sure if they check a couple other G7 and G20 countries, they would find more funds being undetected . I have them also and will forever keep them... I would never give all my investment funds to the US. I also invest though out the UK, Europe and Asia, and very little comes from within the US, so why should we give it all back. This is capitalism at it's best. What is the old saying? Don't hate the player, hate the game.. I'm entitled to not giving majority of my money to the US, but i'm not running for president... And taking a bunch of SH!T That's where my issue comes in with Mitt, he's a habitual lier. Putting him in office is no different than voting in Trump, Wynn or any of these major investors.. This guy isn't close to reality when it comes to lower class Americans. He's no different than that lady telling men what it take to be a man.. You can't!!!
Food for thought; long money hangs with long money... I'm sure BP, Exxon etc and so many other 100, 500 fortune companies would be happy to continue receiving enormous tax breaks..
I agree with the Patriot Act in a since.. If you'll super political nuts on here understood the commodity arena around the world and how easy it is for communist countries to issue bad banking instrument to fund terrorist, you guys would understand why it's been put in place.. Everyone has an opinion just as they have an azzhole, in all honesty don't mean SH!T...
For those who come on here thinking Mitt Romney really is looking for a change; you guys are stupid... This guy isn't for the ppl. I wounder how much *** the Rothchilds will let him invest into for his roll in destroying America... This guy only see $$$$ in his eyes, that's one of the first principle of business.. A zebra strips don't change...
I don't wish to debate politics.. To Hell with politics!!! but I *** sure understand the concept of business!!! And Mitt is that guy, he's only selling false dreams... He's trying to convene a castrated man (US ppl) into believing his *** still works.... If Mitt was to win we would see the end of the US economy as we knew it..
@ hoeboe,
Did you really bring up the Rothchilds in this? LOL, well lets talk about Obama hanging with the Rockefeller's as a young man, known communists, and other Globalist puppets. Heck, Obama is related to George Bush and royalty in Europe (proven genealogical fact on his mother's side). Are you in a state of denial about that?
Does anyone remember when Loser1stillhere's aka "Trollsmasher" scorned *** lover came into the MTO political blogs stalking Loser1? Lol...talking about Loser1 did him wrong? Ah man...then Loser got homeboy's whole account history banned. However, there is a saving grace. I actually have the screen *** from that fateful coming out day. Holla at me if you want me to post it up some where....
Back to the topic: So Loser1stillhere, you didn't deny that Obama is related to Bush, didn't deny that he ran with Communists, didn't deny that his whole ideology came from Rockefellar, you just simply try to sweep it under the rug like it's going to go away. LOL....that ain't how thinks work idiot...
Does Axelrod really want to start slinging mud? Really? Obama, Mr. Flip Flopper himself has a record now. This ain't 2008. He is losing his base and if....that's a mighty big IF he gets reelected, it will be by the skin of his teeth. I know a lot of people who are choosing not to vote because they simply can't support Obama's beliefs. He's walking a thin line.